Stay up to date on upcoming events, deadlines, news, and more by signing up for our newsletters.
At a recent Startup School workshop, students heard from Kabir Kochhar (Stern '06), Founder and Managing Partner of Audacity Ventures, on how early-stage venture actually works in practice. The discussion moved beyond surface-level advice, focusing instead on how reputation, judgment, and discipline shape long-term outcomes in investing.
One of the more differentiated ideas Kabir emphasized was that venture is fundamentally a compounding game of relationships. The best deal flow does not come from cold inbound or platforms, it comes from founders. References, he noted, are the highest quality source of opportunities, which means how you treat founders today directly impacts what you see in the future. Over time, strong behavior compounds into access, while poor behavior quietly closes doors. In that sense, reputation is not just a byproduct of investing, it is a core input into performance.
He also pushed back on the current tendency to over-index on AI as a blanket category. His view was clear: AI for the sake of AI is not a business. The real question is whether a product meaningfully solves something and whether users actually care. He pointed to the importance of retention as a signal, highlighting that companies with highly engaged, “sticky” users create far more optionality than those driven by hype. The analogy to WhatsApp was instructive. At the time of its acquisition, it generated relatively little revenue, but its retention and engagement made it extraordinarily valuable. That same dynamic continues to define the strongest companies today.
Kabir also offered a more nuanced look at how funds themselves influence decision-making. Investment strategy is not static. Between Fund I and Fund II, entire market environments can shift, as seen with the rapid emergence of AI. At the same time, funds often adapt to their limited partners, subtly shaping the types of companies they pursue. Sector-specific funds, in particular, have more flexibility within their niche, but they also operate within a defined lens. For founders, this means that investor behavior is not purely driven by conviction, it is partially structural.
On sourcing, he described a clear divide between reactive and proactive investors. The strongest early-stage investors map markets in advance, identifying sectors, geographies, and even specific companies before they formally come to market. This includes looking at ecosystems like the Nordics and Berlin, where tighter focus can produce more opinionated and differentiated startups. The goal is to build conviction early and invest before large firms like Andreessen Horowitz enter the process, when pricing becomes more competitive and less driven by insight.
Another subtle but important insight was his framing of runway as a governance signal. While runway is often discussed operationally, Kabir positioned it as a reflection of founder discipline. How a company manages its cash says a lot about decision-making under pressure. Investors are not just underwriting survival, they are evaluating how responsibly a founder navigates uncertainty.
The conversation also touched on broader shifts shaping the next generation of companies. Media technology, for instance, is becoming increasingly polarized, raising questions about whether regulation can meaningfully intervene. Kabir suggested that the next major social platforms may emerge from unexpected ecosystems, such as gaming environments like Roblox, where interaction models are fundamentally different from traditional social media. Alongside this, he pointed to income inequality as one of the defining macro challenges that will influence what gets built over the next decade.
At its core, though, his framework for investing comes back to a single idea: you are investing in the person. Products change and markets evolve, but resilience is the constant. The best founders are those who can endure sustained difficulty and still find a way forward. At the same time, Kabir emphasized the importance of judgment on the investor side. Backing the wrong founder is not just a financial risk, it is a reputational one. In venture, your name becomes attached to the people you support.
The session was a reminder that venture is less about chasing trends and more about developing a long-term perspective on people, markets, and behavior. It offered a clear and practical lens into how thoughtful investors at firms like Audacity Ventures approach building conviction in an increasingly noisy landscape.
